The jpg stay on the slow cards forever as the cards are cheap.HD Live View: The live view (video assist) is doubled from 960×640 to 1920×1280.įocus Peaking: The camera shows which parts of the image are in focus with bright colored pixels. I then delete the RAW data from my fast card to reuse it. I copy the RAW to my computer where it all gets backed up in various methods. I have a fast card for RAW and a slower card for JPG. I take the oposite view to BBQue and don’t want to think of that small percentage of time when uncompressed is required and switch settings at that point I prefer the flexibility of going from the ‘negative’ with each new editįor the reason in 1 I shoot uncompressed. The problem with jpg is they degrade every time you save them personally I would never edit from JPG For sure I would think twice if I was using a four or five year old system I’m a programmer who gets computer upgrades to the latest greatest available every year so have no incentive to save size or CPU time. This is dependent on you computer HW more than anything. Many don't because they still haven't the time because they are immediately sent to other assignments - and if they are not, they will be spending their time off with their families and not in front of the computer screen. Some shoot JPEG + RAW so they can also optimize the results later when they get home. Also some photogs work under conditions where sitting down with a computer to develop RAW files is simply not an option even if they had the time. A news photog who covers a soccer game or a Tour de France stage for live coverage on his newspapers website has no choice but to send home JPEGs via his smartphone or other transmission gear coupled to his camera. Shooting JPEGs and letting the camera handle whatever tweaking that has to be done is the only way meeting the deadline. Pros who need to deliver photos with a tight deadline have no choice. But as with everything it takes knowledge, practice and good familarity with the gear to do it well. They can be tweaked a lot in camera to suit ones taste. I guess it is a good bet that you can get a better result from an image that you shot 10 years ago, processing it with today's algorithms compared to an algorithm from 10 years ago. People also forget that the data is only one part of the equation, the RAW processing software is also being improved upon as the time goes on. You can always remove some data but there is no way to restore data that has been lost. shooting compressed would go against my intention. When i shoot RAW, i do it because i want to preserve all the data that i can. Nowadays the storage is cheap and it is getting cheaper with each day. I personally am not a fan of compressed RAW. i guess that would have to be tested) - either to have space on the card to be able to shoot more images, or to save space when archiving the photos. Regarding compressed RAW - the only reason i can think of to shoot compressed is the space saving (except maybe the camera buffer lasts longer with compressed RAW?. Also, having JPEG as a backup in case the card holding the RAWs goes bad, is a good reason. probably to get the benefit of both options at the same time. I imagine that in the age of social media, having a JPEG ready to be uploaded is another possible reason. Yes, people choose to shoot "JPEG only" for multitude of reasons, some of which you already mentioned. think jpegs are good enough without processingĪnd for those who shoot raw.do you shoot compressed? think the jpegs can be processed well enough to satisfy orģ. don't want to deal with the raw file sizes orĢ. I'm aware that raw shooting allows better post processing but it's apparent that some of Sony shooters have decided that either they:ġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |